大學英語四級段落信息匹配題技巧-預覽頁

　

【正文】 常明顯的定位詞(如數字、時間、地點、人物、特殊字體和特殊符號等)。2. 題干信息復雜，考生難以迅速抓住要領。二、信息匹配題難點分析1.有的段落可能對應兩題，有的段落可能不對應任何一題。每句所含的信息出自篇章的某一段落，要求考生找出與每句所含信息相匹配的段落。但總體來看，不管題型怎么變，其實學習方法沒變，還是仍舊需要大家提高閱讀的能力，比如說讀文章的時候，是不是直接拿英語讀，如果讀快速閱讀的時候，還是拿中文邊翻譯邊讀的話，會發現閱讀速度一直會比較慢，所以那么長的文章很難找到細節，所以大家一定要養成拿英語直接閱讀的這樣一種習慣，這樣才能保證我們的閱讀速度又快又準。由于這一題型要求考生把細節信息與其所在的段落進行匹配，因此細節信息的排列絕對是“亂序的”，這就意味著考生從文章開頭到結尾按順序定位的方法是行不通的。即使考生能夠讀懂題干中晦澀難懂的細節信息，但也會在尋找定位詞時遇到很大障礙。其中前四種做題方法比較類似，而后兩種相對較復雜。2．預覽題干，明確關鍵詞　該題型的解題基本思路是：先快速地將題干讀一下，劃出關鍵詞。一般建議在找到中心句后，讀一下末句，可以更精確地掌控段意。一般而言劍橋里的文章組織有三大類。4. 注意字句的形式變化。 5. 注意標記。【關鍵詞的類型】1. 人名、地名和專有名詞2. 一些拼寫較長的詞，比如：internship，petitiveness，globalization，integration，sustainability，innovative，immigration等。我們選它做關鍵詞，瞬間就能找到原文出處了。如：universitybased，onechild。需要注意的是有時候我們需要將這些詞拆開來定位，如onechild在原文中是沒有的，原文是這樣的“They often promise by having just one child. ”這里的one child就不是整體作為形容詞使用了。如六級第54題，關鍵詞之一為the best solution。6. 具有特殊意義的指示性詞匯。 Xu’s Yale lab is more productive, thanks to the lower costs of conducting research in China, and Chinese graduate students, postdoctors and faculty get onthejob training from a worldclass scientist and his . team. F) As a result of its strength in science, the United States has consistently led the world in the mercialization of major new technologies, from the mainframe puter and the integrated circuit of the 1960s to the Internet infrastructure (基礎設施) and applications software of the 1990s. The link between universitybased science and industrial application is often indirect but sometimes highly visible: Silicon Valley was intentionally created by Stanford University, and Route 128 outside Boston has long housed panies spun off from MIT and Harvard. Around the world, governments have encouraged copying of this model, perhaps most successfully in Cambridge, England, where Microsoft and scores of other leading software and biotechnology panies have set up shop around the university. G) For all its success, the United States remains deeply hesitant about sustaining the researchuniversity model. Most politicians recognize the link between investment in science and national economic strength, but support for research funding has been unsteady. The budget of the National Institutes of Health doubled between 1998 and 2003, but has risen more slowly than inflation since then. Support for the physical sciences and engineering barely kept pace with inflation during that same period. The attempt to make up lost ground is wele, but the nation would be better served by steady, predictable increases in science funding at the rate of longterm GDP growth, which is on the order of inflation plus 3 percent per year. H) American politicians have great difficulty recognizing that admitting more foreign students can greatly promote the national interest by increasing international understanding. Adjusted for inflation, public funding for international exchanges and foreignlanguage study is well below the levels of 40 years ago. In the wake of September 11, changes in the visa process caused a dramatic decline in the number of foreign students seeking admission to . universities, and a corresponding surge in enrollments in Australia, Singapore and the . Objections from American university and business leaders led to improvements in the process and a reversal of the decline, but the United States is still seen by many as unweling to international students. I) Most Americans recognize that universities contribute to the nation’s wellbeing through their scientific research, but many fear that foreign students threaten American petitiveness by taking their knowledge and skills back home. They fail to grasp that weling foreign students to the United States has two important positive effects: first, the very best of them stay in the States and—like immigrants throughout history—strengthen the nation。