江蘇省南京市20xx屆高三第三次模擬考試英語試題word版含答案-免費閱讀

　　

【正文】 Bikesharing has taken off in China far faster than in any other market. The market has bee flooded with new panies in recent months. The bikesharing panies operate in a similar way. They use apps that allow users, after paying a deposit, to unlock the wheels with their smartphones. After the journey, users can leave bikes anywhere in public and pay a little money for the use. The service is very popular as it provides an effective solution to “the last kilometer” problem. The promoting of the bikesharing service is also raising questions about profitability, widespread bike vandalism (破壞 ) and theft, and growing government regulation. A Hong Kong man who was arrested for throwing several shared bikes into rivers said he had no regret destroying them because ”the GPS devices in the bikes give away users39。s cofounder and publisher, was quick to assure critics of the appointment process that his son is terribly talented and had to prove himself before being given the post. Apparently Gus worked his way up from more junior positions with the pany, and demonstrated, according to his father, the “drive and discipline and charm, and all the things that show leadership.” Gus Wenner is 22 years old. He is certainly not the only kid out of college, or even out of high school, working at daddy?s firm. Family contacts are a mon way of finding both temporary internships and longtime careers. Opportunities for the children of top 1 percent are not the same as they are for the 99 percent. This is hardly a shock, but it is precisely the type of inequality that reveals the hardtodefine promise of the “Just Do It” version of the American dream and deepens our cynicism (憤世嫉俗 ) about how people get ahead. As a consequence, it weakens support for public policies that could address the lack of upward mobility among children born at the bottom, who ought to be given Parity. A strong tie between adult outes and family background annoys Americans. When an anization conducted a nationally representative survey asking about the meaning of “the American dream,” some typical answers included: “Being free to say or do what you want” and Being free to acplish almost anything you want with hard work,” but also “Being able to succeed regardless of the economic circumstances in which you were born.” This is exactly the reason that “the American dream,” is not only a defining metaphor for the country, but also why Americans have long been willing to tolerate a good deal more economic inequality than citizens of many other rich countries. A belief in the possibility of upward mobility not only morally justifies inequality as the expression of talents and energies, but also extends a promise to those with lower ines. After all, why would you be a strong advocate for reducing inequality if you believe that you, or eventually your children, were likely to climb the ine ladder? Hard work and perseverance (毅力 ) will always be ingredients for success, but higher inequality has made having successful parents, if not essential, certainly a central part of the recipe. The belief that talent is something you are born with, and that opportunities are open to anyone with ambition and energy, also has a dangerous consequence. When the public policy is focused on the difficult situation of the poor, this belief can help the concept resurface that the poor are “undeserving” and are the authors of their own situation. Yet we actually know a good deal about why children of the poor have a higher chance of being stuck on poverty as adults. The recipes for breaking this intergenerational trap are clear。 Research shows that when we are absorbed in an activity, even minor distractions (分心 ) can have a huge effect. According to a study, regaining our 36 drive following an interruption can take about 20 minutes. Multitasking (多任務(wù) )， as many studies have shown, is a myth (謬論 ). A more accurate 37 of what happens when we tell ourselves we are multitasking is that we?re rapidly 38 between activities, sucking our mental energy. And the 39 can be surprisingly serious. An experiment found that we lose as many as 10 IQ points when we allow our work to be 40 by distractions like s and text messages. The 41 is that multitasking is enjoyable. It?s fun to satisfy your curiosity. Who knows what that next or text message holds 42? Finding out provides immediate satisfaction. 43, resisting distractions and staying on task requires 44 and mental effort. So, what are we to do? Our strategy is to change the 45 to move temptation further away: shut down your program or 46 your phone. It?s a lot easier to stay on task when you?re not 47 fighting off mental desires. The alternative, which most of us consider mon, is 48 to dieting in a bakery. We all need the willpower to resist the temptations, but doing so es with 49 costs to our limited supply of willpower. Another worthwhile 50 is to collect similar activities together, keeping transition (轉(zhuǎn)換 ) time to a 51 point. Instead of spreading phone calls, meetings and s throughout your day, try 52 related tasks so that there are fewer transitions. In some jobs, multitasking is 53. Some of us truly do need to stay 54 to our clients, colleagues and managers. So it39。 第二部分 英語知識運用（共兩節(jié)，滿分 35 分） 第一節(jié) 單項填空（共 15 小題；每小題 1 分，滿分 15 分） 請認(rèn)其閱讀下面各題，從題中所給的 A、 B、 C、 D 四個選項中，選出最佳選項，并在答題紙上將該項涂黑。s worth noting that limiting disruptions is the only solution. Remember the more you do to minimize taskswitching over the course of the day, the more ability you?ll have for activities that actually 55. Even small changes can make a big difference. 36. A. initial B. personal C. inner D. ambitious 37. A. plan B. account C. prediction D. insight 38. A. switching B. swinging C. swapping D. shuttling 39. A. benefits B. reasons C. consequences D