gre作文教程(編輯修改稿)

　

【文章內容簡介】 contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence SCORE 0 ? Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal 9 2． 4 ETS Argument 評分標準 GRE Scoring Guide: Analyze an Argument Each Analyze an Argument essay will be scored on a 6point holistic scale according to the criteria below. Although the GRE Writing Assessment contains two discrete essaywriting tasks, a single bined score is reported because it is more reliable than either task score alone. The score reported will represent the average of the scores for the two essays. SCORE 6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, wellarticulated critique of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully. A typical paper in this category ? clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully ? develops ideas cogently, anizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions ? effectively supports the main points of the critique ? demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety ? demonstrates facility with the conventions (., grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors SCORE 5 A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, welldeveloped critique of the argument and conveys meaning clearly. A typical paper in this category ? clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them in a generally perceptive way ? develops ideas clearly, anizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions ? sensibly supports the main points of the critique ? demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety ? demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors SCORE 4 A 4 paper presents a petent critique of the argument and conveys meaning adequately. A typical paper in this category 10 ? identifies and analyzes important features of the argument ? develops and anizes ideas satisfactorily but may not connect them with transitions ? supports the main points of the critique ? demonstrates sufficient control of language to express ideas with reasonable clarity ? generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors SCORE 3 A 3 paper demonstrates some petence in its critique of the argument and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed. A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of the following characteristics: ? does not identify or analyze most of the important features of the argument, although some analysis of the argument is present ? mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly ? is limited in the logical development and anization of ideas ? offers support of little relevance and value for points of the critique ? lacks clarity in expressing ideas ? contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning SCORE 2 A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of the following characteristics: ? does not present a critique based on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer39。s own views on the subject ? does not develop ideas, or is disanized and illogical ? provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support ? has serious problems in the use of language and in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning ? contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning SCORE 1 A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in both analysis AND writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits more than one of the following characteristics: ? provides little or no evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the argument ? provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an anized response ? has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning ? contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence SCORE 0 11 ? Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal. 第三章 入門如何準備 滿分校園 () gre 備考筆考班論壇里面，問的最多的問題，就是：“我是新手，不知道從哪里下手？往往一句都寫不出來。看到版主們寫的這么好的文章，自己不知道如何開始。看到一篇論題，寫什么？如何寫？心理一點條理都沒有。” 這個，是猴哥這本書的寫作重點。 對于大部分中國考生來說，英語的寫作，實在是太少了。我們也只在中考、高考、四級、六級、研究生等國內考試前，突擊背過幾篇范文，寫過 少數的幾篇文章。 看看版主們的文章。（附在本章最后），你就會發現，也有些的好的人。他們為什么寫的那么好呢？他們經常寫，寫的多了，自然就有感覺了。猴哥滿分校園作文版版主 scortio，已經堅持每日一篇作文 40 多天，她的作文，被很多 g 友誤認為是 ETS 的范文。實際上，她的文章，大部分都可以達到 5 分的標準，很多，甚 至是 6 分的標準。本書有大量的版主和 G 友的精彩作文。 從上面的論述，我們可以得出一個結論： 多練是寫好 GRE 作文的一個重要途徑。 但是，這如前面所說，很多 G 友也想多練，但是，不知道如何開始。 猴哥作文備考 11 步。 仔細閱讀本書的第一章，對 GRE 作文有一個整體了解。知道要寫什么。 仔細閱讀本書的第二章的第一節，知道 ETS 對 GRE 作文的評分標準，和猴哥對三個寫作重點的分析。 仔細研讀本書“猴哥閱讀式作文備考法”，體會這一種入門方法，仔細看猴哥使用這個方法的兩個例子。這個，是 入門的關鍵。先讀 ETS 的 6 分范文，然后就知道如何寫了。但是，讀，就一定要讀投，要對自己寫作能力有大的提高。如何讀，請看相關章節。 在掌握了“猴哥閱讀式作文備考法”之后，使用本書提供的 72 篇 ETS 公布的范文，對其中的 46 分的 36 篇，用閱讀式方法，進行復習。這個過程， 46 分的不用全練，可以先練 12 篇。這些文章，也是最值得背誦的。本熟這些文章，你基本上就可以寫出 4 分的作文了。同時，可以看看少量的 31 分作文，看看為什么分數低，自己如何避免。 仔細閱讀本書“集體寫作法”一章。體會本方法的精髓。然 后，參加到“集體寫作法”的大本營中來。你先開始可能寫不出來，每天寫一篇也不現實。但是，每天對于滿分校園的主題，寫一篇提綱，還是可以的。寫提綱，是寫作文的開始。 仔細閱讀本書“互相修改法”一章。體會本方法的精髓。然后，參加到“互相修改法”大本營中來。修改別人的文章，你是從改卷者的角度閱讀，你就會不由自主的變得苛刻起來。你也會發現別人的很多問題，而這些問題，如果出在自己身上，往往不容易發現，所謂“旁觀者清，當局者迷”。而你的作品，也會被很多人修改。 同時，繼續使用“猴哥閱讀式作文備考法”，對“集 中寫作法”中，本日寫的比較好的文章，進行閱讀。總結出的“句型收獲”的句子（參見本書“經典句型收集”一章），放到滿分校園“經典句型收集”論壇。和大家共享。 在練習了一段時間后，再回過頭來，使用“猴