雅思作文2(編輯修改稿)

　

【文章內容簡介】 lk of are the top runners in their specialized fields and most of them own outstanding characters and thus, the mass media give priority on all their details of paparazzi follow the famous people and take photos in special ways to yield the curiosity of the , I would state my objection to this issue after analyzing the following three of all, everyone owns the right to enjoy their spare time and private time even if they are famous finishing their work, they could spend their time with their family and friends, go shopping, travel and do sports for need private space to deal with personal stuffs which do not want to be numerous are contributes the celebrities have made to our society that they deserve to be respected but not try to expose their details of personal is more, the growing curiosity to privacies of famous people leads to a phenomenon that a new kind of journalist which is named Paparazzi es into those people need to do is track the celebrities stealthily using whatever far as I am concerned, they lose the main spirit of a journalist that is to report the event and significant things to some extent, they infringe the privacy right of famous people, which can not be conclusion, I maintain that it is not appropriate for a magazine or newspaper to report the private information of fans should support them via normal other countries the police in the UK do not carry think this leaves citizens unprotected, while others consider it reduces the overall level of violence in reasons for both sides of argument and state your own , it bees a controversial issue that whether or not the police in the UK should carry people assert that the police could protect the residents better with taking , others hold the view that it may avoid the violence accidents without bringing guns, to some speaking, I prefer to the former one hand, despite of the fact that the crime rate is on the decrease these years, it does not mean entire disappearance of police should take the responsibility to deal with them, such as murder, rape and robbery they had guns on hand, it could be relatively successful to arrest the instance, if the criminal takes a hostage and he is extremely aggressive, the sniper who takes a special gun within a certain distance could shoot him to that the police are able to protect the citizens the other hand, some people insist that carrying no guns contributes to the decrease of violence in one thing, when criminals see the policeman putting a gun to them, they may bee desperate and outof mind, and even do anything without considering the result, which may result in unexpected innocent would not happen if policeman does not carry a another, no one